Skip to content
Flows

What Flows just did

Based on your request to build Landing Page Copy, Flows created 5 implementation stages and 15 checks.

You asked for: Produce complete landing page copy: headline system, section-by-section copy, CTAs, and objection handling.. Flows generated 5 stages because the application requires A headline that passes the 5-second test; Section copy: problem, solution, how it works, proof, pricing, FAQ; CTAs with action-specific language. Each stage tells your AI builder what to do, tests whether it actually worked, and gives a repair instruction when it fails. These checks are designed to catch: Headlines describing the category instead of the outcome; Feature lists with no benefit translation; 'Get Started' buttons with no context.

Example failure

The form reported success, but no database record was created.

What Flows does

Flows detects the failure, generates a repair instruction, reruns the test, and stores the passing evidence.

Stages — Plan → Build → Test → Fix → Prove → Ship

5 stages · 15 checks · progressive disclosure — open a stage for details

Copy to external builder

Copies a prompt for Claude/Cursor/etc. Records prompt_copied only — not execution, commits, or checks.

Execute through Oort

Requires Sign in with Oort + a provider connection (BYOK). Keys stay on Oort. A model name in the dropdown is not the same as a live connection.

Next

Check off: The audience is specific

Add a proof note on each check — a checkbox alone is weak proof.

Probes & advanced tools are under “More verification tools”. Experience level: Settings.

Landing Page Copy
Launch60-90 minutes

Project (saved with proof)

Project binding: Unbound — complete project binding before trusting this run · missing repositoryUrl, repositoryStartCommit, environment, stack

More verification tools (probes, timeline, adapters)Show

App persistence (create → read → assert token)

Body template: {"probe":"{{token}}","title":"flows-probe-{{token}}"}. Needs CORS-readable public create/list endpoints (or inconclusive). Badge only when create→read→refresh finds the token (detects false success).

Two-account authorization (User B cannot see/change User A)

Authorization evidence source: Cross-account ownership test (trust level 5/6). These are not equivalent. Unauthenticated probe alone is weaker (source: unauthenticated API probe). Tokens stay in this browser session only — not uploaded to Flows servers.

Generated edge-case tests (review / approve)

  • api_probe Submitting the form empty is rejected with a clear error
  • api_probe Each required field can be omitted and fails validation
  • api_probe Malformed email is rejected
  • api_probe Logged-out users cannot open protected pages
  • api_probe Protected API rejects requests without credentials

Generated from this route’s signals — you approve; you do not invent security tests.

Content probe (GET body contains text)

In-product content probe reads response text when CORS allows — not full DOM/click automation. Playwright script is optional and external.

Proof strength

thin · 0/100

Heuristic from notes + probes + gates — not a production certification.

Verification adapters

  • Deploy URL probe · idle
  • API path probe · idle
  • Authz probe (unauth → 401/403) · idle
  • Browser persistence · idle
  • App persistence (create→read) · idle
  • Content / body text probe · idle
  • In-product Playwright DOM · not embedded (download external script)

Filled circles = available here. Empty = not shipped. Probes are not a production audit. Adapter docs

0/5 steps0%
Recording plan identity…

Step 1 of 5

Not started

Define audience and message hierarchy

Copy converts one reader at a time - pick the reader first.

Flows keeps plan, checks, failures, and next steps connected

Your AI tool writes or changes the code

Repository grounds the plan only after inspect

Checks always carry a validation tier

Not checkedChecks not locked

How this plan was created

Plan from project details

Flows creates steps using the goal, requirements, stack, platform, and details you provide.

  • Project description
  • Selected template / route
  • User-entered stack
  • Constraints and notes
  • Landing Page Copy

No repository inspection implied. Connect and inspect a codebase to ground steps in real files.

Codebase access

Checking GitHub…

Or paste a repository URL manually
Plan instructions

Use these instructions in Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Emergent, or another builder.

Define the messaging foundation for my landing page. I will describe the product below. Produce: the ONE primary audience (specific role/situation, not 'everyone'); their top 3 pains in their own words; the primary transformation the product delivers; the message hierarchy (the one thing they must believe, then supporting points in order); and the single primary action the page drives toward. MY PRODUCT: [describe here]

The AI tool writes code — Flows only organizes the plan · Complete implementation prompt with explicit requirements

Project context

Copies the project goal, technical details, current step, previous progress, and checks so your AI tool understands what it is working on.

Expected after this step

A one-audience messaging foundation with hierarchy and primary action.

Should not happen

  • Headlines describing the category instead of the outcome
  • Feature lists with no benefit translation
  • 'Get Started' buttons with no context
  • Copy that addresses three audiences and convinces none

Verify gate — prove this step works before continuing

Do not move on until every check is true. Add proof notes — a checked box alone is weak proof. Checks are manual by default; deploy/API probes live under “More verification tools” and do not auto-check boxes.

Do not continue if…

  • !Headlines describing the category instead of the outcome
  • !Feature lists with no benefit translation
  • !'Get Started' buttons with no context
  • !Copy that addresses three audiences and convinces none

Repair path — if this step fails

Use the Repair Prompt when a verify gate fails. Loop: Detected → Diagnosed → Repair issued → Changed → Retested → Resolved

Show repair prompt textShow

The foundation targets multiple audiences. Choose the single highest-value reader and rewrite the pains and hierarchy for them alone.

Your notes for this step

Definition of Done

Final route-level requirements. Manual checks — separate from per-step verify gates. Completing step gates does not auto-check these. Route completion is not a production-ready claim.

0/4 · manual