What Flows just did
Based on your request to build Add Direct Messaging Feature, Flows created 7 implementation stages and 22 checks.
You asked for: Enable registered users to start private conversations, exchange persistent messages, see read status, and have the UI update in near‑real‑time.. Flows generated 7 stages because the application requires Persist messages and conversations in PostgreSQL via Prisma.; Secure API endpoints: only participants may read/write.; Provide RESTful endpoints for sending, fetching, and marking messages as read.. Each stage tells your AI builder what to do, tests whether it actually worked, and gives a repair instruction when it fails. These checks are designed to catch: AI returns placeholder schemas or TODO comments instead of real Prisma models.; Generated API routes lack proper authentication checks or return mock data.; UI component uses static sample messages rather than fetching from the API..
Example failure
The form reported success, but no database record was created.
What Flows does
Flows detects the failure, generates a repair instruction, reruns the test, and stores the passing evidence.
Stages — Plan → Build → Test → Fix → Prove → Ship
7 stages · 22 checks · progressive disclosure — open a stage for details
Copy to external builder
Copies a prompt for Claude/Cursor/etc. Records prompt_copied only — not execution, commits, or checks.
Execute through Oort
Requires Sign in with Oort + a provider connection (BYOK). Keys stay on Oort. A model name in the dropdown is not the same as a live connection.
Next
Check off: Do the new models appear in schema.prisma?
Add a proof note on each check — a checkbox alone is weak proof.
Probes & advanced tools are under “More verification tools”. Experience level: Settings.
Project (saved with proof)
Project binding: Unbound — complete project binding before trusting this run · missing repositoryUrl, repositoryStartCommit, environment, stack
More verification tools (probes, timeline, adapters)Show
App persistence (create → read → assert token)
Body template: {"probe":"{{token}}","title":"flows-probe-{{token}}"}. Needs CORS-readable public create/list endpoints (or inconclusive). Badge only when create→read→refresh finds the token (detects false success).
Two-account authorization (User B cannot see/change User A)
Authorization evidence source: Cross-account ownership test (trust level 5/6). These are not equivalent. Unauthenticated probe alone is weaker (source: unauthenticated API probe). Tokens stay in this browser session only — not uploaded to Flows servers.
Generated edge-case tests (review / approve)
- api_probe Submitting the form empty is rejected with a clear error
- api_probe Each required field can be omitted and fails validation
- api_probe Malformed email is rejected
- api_probe Malformed phone is rejected when phone is collected
- api_probe Duplicate submission does not create two records
- api_probe Double-click submit creates only one record
- false_success_probe Failed request does not show success
- browser_automation Refresh during submission does not leave corrupt state
- api_probe Oversized input is rejected
- api_probe Unsafe strings do not execute or break storage
- api_probe Create then refresh still shows the record
- api_probe Edit then refresh keeps the edit
- api_probe Delete then refresh removes the record
- api_probe Nonexistent record ID fails cleanly
- cross_account_probe Cross-user record identifier is rejected
Generated from this route’s signals — you approve; you do not invent security tests.
Content probe (GET body contains text)
In-product content probe reads response text when CORS allows — not full DOM/click automation. Playwright script is optional and external.
Proof strength
thin · 0/100
Heuristic from notes + probes + gates — not a production certification.
Verification adapters
- ● Deploy URL probe · idle
- ● API path probe · idle
- ● Authz probe (unauth → 401/403) · idle
- ● Browser persistence · idle
- ● App persistence (create→read) · idle
- ● Content / body text probe · idle
- ○ In-product Playwright DOM · not embedded (download external script)
Filled circles = available here. Empty = not shipped. Probes are not a production audit. Adapter docs
Step 1 of 7
Not startedDesign Message & Conversation Data Model
Create database structures to store chats and individual messages
The app uses Prisma with a PostgreSQL database. Existing User model has id (UUID). Follow current project conventions for migrations and naming.
Flows keeps plan, checks, failures, and next steps connected
Your AI tool writes or changes the code
Repository grounds the plan only after inspect
Checks always carry a validation tier
How this plan was created
Plan from project details
Flows creates steps using the goal, requirements, stack, platform, and details you provide.
- Project description
- Selected template / route
- User-entered stack
- Constraints and notes
- Add Direct Messaging Feature
No repository inspection implied. Connect and inspect a codebase to ground steps in real files.
Codebase access
Checking GitHub…
Or paste a repository URL manually
Use these instructions in Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Emergent, or another builder.
Write Prisma schema definitions for two new models: Conversation (id UUID primary key, participantAId UUID, participantBId UUID, createdAt timestamp, updatedAt timestamp) and Message (id UUID primary key, conversationId UUID foreign key, senderId UUID foreign key, content String, sentAt timestamp, read Boolean default false). Add necessary indexes for fast lookup (e.g., participant pair, conversationId). Provide the exact lines to insert into schema.prisma and a migration command (prisma migrate dev). Ensure the models reference the existing User model correctly and compile without errors.
Project context
Copies the project goal, technical details, current step, previous progress, and checks so your AI tool understands what it is working on.
Expected after this step
schema.prisma contains Conversation and Message models; `prisma migrate dev` runs successfully; database tables are created.
Should not happen
- ✕AI returns placeholder schemas or TODO comments instead of real Prisma models.
- ✕Generated API routes lack proper authentication checks or return mock data.
- ✕UI component uses static sample messages rather than fetching from the API.
- ✕Missing migration for new fields (e.g., readAt) causing runtime errors.
Verify gate — prove this step works before continuing
Do not move on until every check is true. Add proof notes — a checked box alone is weak proof. Checks are manual by default; deploy/API probes live under “More verification tools” and do not auto-check boxes.
Do not continue if…
- !AI returns placeholder schemas or TODO comments instead of real Prisma models.
- !Generated API routes lack proper authentication checks or return mock data.
- !UI component uses static sample messages rather than fetching from the API.
- !Missing migration for new fields (e.g., readAt) causing runtime errors.
- !Polling logic omitted or duplicates messages on each fetch.
Repair path — if this step fails
Use the Repair Prompt when a verify gate fails. Loop: Detected → Diagnosed → Repair issued → Changed → Retested → Resolved
Show repair prompt textShow
The schema definitions were incomplete or contained placeholder comments. Regenerate the full Conversation and Message model blocks with all required fields, indexes, and foreign keys, and include a runnable `prisma migrate dev` command.
Your notes for this step
Definition of Done
Final route-level requirements. Manual checks — separate from per-step verify gates. Completing step gates does not auto-check these. Route completion is not a production-ready claim.