Skip to content
Flows

What Flows just did

Based on your request to build Admin Dashboard, Flows created 6 implementation stages and 21 checks.

You asked for: Create an admin dashboard with real stats, searchable data tables, and working admin actions.. Flows generated 6 stages because the application requires Stats cards computed from real database data; Data table with search, filter, and pagination; Row actions (view, edit, disable/delete) that persist. Each stage tells your AI builder what to do, tests whether it actually worked, and gives a repair instruction when it fails. These checks are designed to catch: Stats cards showing hardcoded numbers; Tables rendering static arrays instead of database queries; Delete/disable that only removes the row from local state.

Example failure

The form reported success, but no database record was created.

What Flows does

Flows detects the failure, generates a repair instruction, reruns the test, and stores the passing evidence.

Stages — Plan → Build → Test → Fix → Prove → Ship

6 stages · 21 checks · progressive disclosure — open a stage for details

Copy to external builder

Copies a prompt for Claude/Cursor/etc. Records prompt_copied only — not execution, commits, or checks.

Execute through Oort

Requires Sign in with Oort + a provider connection (BYOK). Keys stay on Oort. A model name in the dropdown is not the same as a live connection.

Next

Check off: Entities to manage are listed

Add a proof note on each check — a checkbox alone is weak proof.

Probes & advanced tools are under “More verification tools”. Experience level: Settings.

Admin Dashboard
App Builder45-90 minutes

Project (saved with proof)

Project binding: Unbound — complete project binding before trusting this run · missing repositoryUrl, repositoryStartCommit, environment, stack

More verification tools (probes, timeline, adapters)Show

App persistence (create → read → assert token)

Body template: {"probe":"{{token}}","title":"flows-probe-{{token}}"}. Needs CORS-readable public create/list endpoints (or inconclusive). Badge only when create→read→refresh finds the token (detects false success).

Two-account authorization (User B cannot see/change User A)

Authorization evidence source: Cross-account ownership test (trust level 5/6). These are not equivalent. Unauthenticated probe alone is weaker (source: unauthenticated API probe). Tokens stay in this browser session only — not uploaded to Flows servers.

Generated edge-case tests (review / approve)

  • api_probe Submitting the form empty is rejected with a clear error
  • api_probe Each required field can be omitted and fails validation
  • api_probe Malformed email is rejected
  • api_probe Malformed phone is rejected when phone is collected
  • api_probe Duplicate submission does not create two records
  • api_probe Double-click submit creates only one record
  • false_success_probe Failed request does not show success
  • browser_automation Refresh during submission does not leave corrupt state
  • api_probe Oversized input is rejected
  • api_probe Unsafe strings do not execute or break storage
  • cross_account_probe User B cannot see or change User A’s data
  • cross_account_probe Participant cannot call coach/admin endpoints
  • cross_account_probe URL/body ID tampering cannot cross tenant boundary
  • api_probe Create then refresh still shows the record
  • api_probe Edit then refresh keeps the edit
  • api_probe Delete then refresh removes the record

Generated from this route’s signals — you approve; you do not invent security tests.

Content probe (GET body contains text)

In-product content probe reads response text when CORS allows — not full DOM/click automation. Playwright script is optional and external.

Proof strength

thin · 0/100

Heuristic from notes + probes + gates — not a production certification.

Verification adapters

  • Deploy URL probe · idle
  • API path probe · idle
  • Authz probe (unauth → 401/403) · idle
  • Browser persistence · idle
  • App persistence (create→read) · idle
  • Content / body text probe · idle
  • In-product Playwright DOM · not embedded (download external script)

Filled circles = available here. Empty = not shipped. Probes are not a production audit. Adapter docs

0/6 steps0%
Recording plan identity…

Step 1 of 6

Not started

Define admin scope and data

Decide exactly what the admin manages so the dashboard is concrete, not decorative.

Flows keeps plan, checks, failures, and next steps connected

Your AI tool writes or changes the code

Repository grounds the plan only after inspect

Checks always carry a validation tier

Not checkedChecks not locked

How this plan was created

Plan from project details

Flows creates steps using the goal, requirements, stack, platform, and details you provide.

  • Project description
  • Selected template / route
  • User-entered stack
  • Constraints and notes
  • Admin Dashboard

No repository inspection implied. Connect and inspect a codebase to ground steps in real files.

Codebase access

Checking GitHub…

Or paste a repository URL manually
Plan instructions

Use these instructions in Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Emergent, or another builder.

Define the admin dashboard spec for this app. List: the entities admins manage (e.g. users, orders, content), the 4-6 stats that matter (with the exact query behind each), the table columns per entity, the row actions (view/edit/disable/delete) and what each changes in the database, and who counts as admin. Every stat and action must map to real data - no decorative metrics.

The AI tool writes code — Flows only organizes the plan · Complete implementation prompt with explicit requirements

Project context

Copies the project goal, technical details, current step, previous progress, and checks so your AI tool understands what it is working on.

Expected after this step

A spec mapping every stat, column, and action to real data and queries.

Should not happen

  • Stats cards showing hardcoded numbers
  • Tables rendering static arrays instead of database queries
  • Delete/disable that only removes the row from local state
  • Admin routes reachable by any logged-in user

Verify gate — prove this step works before continuing

Do not move on until every check is true. Add proof notes — a checked box alone is weak proof. Checks are manual by default; deploy/API probes live under “More verification tools” and do not auto-check boxes.

Do not continue if…

  • !Stats cards showing hardcoded numbers
  • !Tables rendering static arrays instead of database queries
  • !Delete/disable that only removes the row from local state
  • !Admin routes reachable by any logged-in user

Repair path — if this step fails

Use the Repair Prompt when a verify gate fails. Loop: Detected → Diagnosed → Repair issued → Changed → Retested → Resolved

Show repair prompt textShow

The spec includes decorative metrics with no data source. Remove or replace them - every stat must state the exact query or computation behind it.

Your notes for this step

Definition of Done

Final route-level requirements. Manual checks — separate from per-step verify gates. Completing step gates does not auto-check these. Route completion is not a production-ready claim.

0/4 · manual