Skip to content
Flows
Tier 1 · Claude Code internals Claude Code internals · fetched 2026-07-02

claude-code-evolution

Tracks how Claude Code changed version over version and ports the strongest architecture, prompt-engineering, and skill-system ideas into the OpenClaw platform (analysis scale: 1,903 files, ~512k lines). The best single source for 'what the leading harness added over time' insights.

View source on GitHub

Key takeaways

  • 01

    Version-over-version deltas reveal which harness features earned their keep

  • 02

    Prompt and skill-system changes are catalogued alongside code changes

  • 03

    Demonstrates migrating harness patterns to another platform

Flows built on this research

From the archive

Verbatim excerpts mined from our local archive of this repository — the prompts, schemas, and patterns worth stealing.

Prompt

The /remember skill: memory triage with a destination table

Review the user's memory landscape and produce a clear report of proposed changes, grouped by action type. Do NOT apply changes - present proposals for user approval.

Classify each auto-memory entry:
| CLAUDE.md | Project conventions all contributors should follow | "use bun not npm", "API routes use kebab-case" |
| CLAUDE.local.md | Personal instructions not applicable to others | "I prefer concise responses", "don't auto-commit" |
| Team memory | Org-wide knowledge across repositories | "deploy PRs go through #deploy-queue" |
| Stay in auto-memory | Working notes, temporary context | Session-specific observations |

When unsure, ask rather than guess.

A reconstruction of Claude Code's memory-review flow: memories get promoted up a visibility ladder (auto -> personal -> project -> team), never silently.

skills/claude-code-remember/SKILL.md

Agent pattern

The /simplify skill: three parallel review lenses

Launch all three agents concurrently. Pass each agent the full diff.

Agent 1: Code Reuse Review - search for existing utilities that could replace newly written code; flag any new function that duplicates existing functionality.

Agent 2: Code Quality Review - redundant state, parameter sprawl, copy-paste with slight variation, leaky abstractions, stringly-typed code, unnecessary comments explaining WHAT the code does.

Agent 3 (efficiency) reviews the same diff for performance issues.

Code review decomposed by failure mode rather than by file: each parallel reviewer hunts one specific class of problem across the whole diff.

skills/claude-code-simplify/SKILL.md